Starting in 1841, the British government undertook to conduct a census of all its subjects every ten years. William Mcgonagall therefore appears in seven censuses and they provide a fascinating series of snapshots of his changing circumstances and fortunes.
The following census records are derived from the on-line records available at the Scotland’s People website.
1841
William’s first appearance in the record – his first appearance in any official document – is also his most controversial. In his autobiographies, and in later censuses, he would claim to have been born in Edinburgh. However, here his birthplace is given as Ireland. What’s going on? It’s possible that he would want to cover the stigma of being an Irish immigrant by falsifying his birthplace. It’s also quite possible that a busy enumerator faced with a clutch of McGonagalls all born in different places simply classified them all as Irish. Maybe it was filled in by a neighbour who knew that baby Margret had been born locally but didn’t know about the others. We’ll probably never know for sure.
The census does at least confirm that William followed his father into the trade of the hand loom weaver.
Street | Name | Age | Trade | Where Born |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hawkshill | Charles McGonigal | 50 | HLW | Ireland |
Margret -”- | 40 | – | Ireland | |
William -”- | 15 | HLW | Ireland | |
Jannet -”- | 13 | Flax Spinner | Ireland | |
James -”- | 12 | – | Ireland | |
Eliza -”- | 9 | – | Ireland | |
Sally -”- | 6 | – | Ireland | |
Joseph -”- | 4 | – | Ireland | |
Margret -”- | 9 mo. | – | Dundee |
1851
Ten years have passed and much has changed in the life of young William. In 1846 he had married Jean King, and here he is the head of his own household and with the beginnings of his own family. Admittedly he’s having to share with (presumably) his mother- and brother-in-law but it’s a start.
The enumerator seems to have assumed that the two young children in the house were Kings. Later censuses make it clear that they were the first of William & Jean’s own family. One wonders also how much confusion was caused by all the menfolk in the house being called William…
Address | Name | Relation to Head | Condition | Age | Occupation | Where Born |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
44 West Port | William McGunnagall | Head | Mar | 26 | Weaver | Edinburgh |
Jean -”- | Wife | Mar | 25 | – | Stirling | |
Jean King | Lodger | U | 51 | – | Ireland | |
William -”- | Lodger | U | 33 | Mill Worker | Stirling | |
William -”- | Lodger | U | 4 | – | – | |
Margaret -”- | Lodger | U | 17 mo. | – | – |
1861
Another decade has passed and the McGonagall family is growing apace. Young William and Margaret have acquired three younger siblings and are beginning to contribute to the family income. Further help comes from a lodger who is, we assume, either Jean’s sister or her niece.
We might also note that William has begun to be cagey about his year of birth. In the ten years since the last census, the future poet has only aged by six years, and also become a year younger than his wife instead of a year older.
Address | Name | Relation to Head | Condition | Age | Occupation | Where Born |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 Mid Wynd | William McGonagall | Head | Mar | 32 | Carpet Weaver | Edinburgh |
Jean -”- | Wife | Mar | 33 | – | Stirling | |
William -”- | Son | Un | 15 | Millworker | Dundee | |
Margaret -”- | Daughter | 13 | Millworker | Dundee | ||
Joseph -”- | Son | 7 | Dundee | |||
Charles -”- | Son | 4 | Dundee | |||
Mary King -”- | Daughter | 1 | Dundee | |||
Margaret King | Lodger | Un | 18 | Millworker | Dundee |
1871
Ten years on and the last of William & Jean’s children has been born. Four of the older children are working, but Margaret has flown the nest and is making a living on her own somewhere.
Address | Name | Relation to Head | Condition | Age | Occupation | Where Born |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
41 Step Row | William McGonagall | Head | Mar | 44 | Carpet Weaver | Edinburgh |
Jean -”- | Wife | Mar | 43 | Stirling | ||
William -”- Jr | Son | Unm | 20 | Millworker | Dundee | |
Joseph -”- | Son | Unm | 16 | Millworker | Dundee | |
Charles -”- | Son | 12 | Ropemaker (Appr) | Dundee | ||
Mary -”- | Daughter | 10 | Millworker | Dundee | ||
James -”- | Son | 8 | Dundee | |||
John -”- | Son | 5 | Dundee | |||
Thomas -”- | Son | 1 | Dundee |
1881
It’s been a most eventful ten years since the previous census. Most notably, of course, William has received the gift of poetry, though the enumerator clearly isn’t sure that “Poet” is a proper occupation for a working man.
Elsewhere, in 1873, Margaret has “got into trouble” and given birth to an illegitimate son. She’s not returned to the family fold, but the poet’s first grandchild is welcome – provided he can find space in a dwelling with no fewer than eight (by the standards of the time) adult occupants. Little Andrew is also the first member of the family to benefit from the new 1875 Education Act – he’s going to school!
Joseph has made a break from the family’s preference for the textile industry and got a job in the dockyard. Meanwhile Charles has found an unusual profession making the wood and iron combs, or “hackles” used in the linen industry.
Address | Name | Condition | Age | Relation to Head | Where Born | Occupation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19 Patons Lane | William McGonnigal | Mar | 55 | Head | Edinburgh | “Poet” |
Jean -”- | Mar | 57 | Wife | Stirling | Housewife | |
William -”- | Unmarried | 27 | Son | Dundee | Mill Worker | |
Joseph -”- | Unmarried | 22 | Son | Dundee | Ship Painter | |
Charles -”- | Unmarried | 20 | Son | Dundee | Hackle Maker | |
Mary -”- | Unmarried | 19 | Daughter | Dundee | Mill Worker | |
James -”- | Unmarried | 17 | Son | Dundee | Mill Worker | |
John -”- | N/A | 14 | Son | Dundee | Roper (Unemployed) | |
Andrew -”- | N/A | 7 | Grandson | Dundee | Scholar |
1891
As William’s period in Dundee nears its end, the enumerator is no happier with his stated profession and tacks on a proper job just to make sure. He’s not noticed that Andrew is not really a son of the householders, given his scandalous origins his grandparents are probably happy to leave it that way.
Address | Name | Relation to Head | Condition | Age | Occupation | Where Born |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
41 Patons Lane | William McGonegal | Head | Mar | 62 | “Poet” & late Carpet Weaver | Edinburgh |
Jane -”- | Wife | Mar | 62 | Stirling | ||
James -”- | Son | Unm | 27 | Jute Ropespinner | Dundee | |
John -”- | Son | Unm | 25 | -”- | Dundee | |
Andrew -”- | Son | Unm | 15 | -”- | Dundee |
1901
McGonagall’s final entry comes from Edinburgh. The bureaucracy of the Scottish capital has no problem accommodating a man working as a poet, but does that make him a worker? A dutiful younger daughter has followed to help look after her parents in their last days.
Address | Name | Relation to Head | Condition | Age | Occupation | Employer, Worker or on Own Account | Where Born |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Cotts Union Bldgs | William McGonagall | Head | Mar | 78 | Poet | Worker? | Edinburgh |
Jean -”- | Wife | Mar | 76 | – | – | Stirling | |
Mary -”- | Daughter | S | 40 | – | – | Dundee |
I’ve found so many different spellings of McGonigal during my years of researching my family history…McGunigal,McGonnigal,McGonegal,McGonigle etc.,
I did a project on the “POET” a few years ago to see if I could find a connection,but couldn’t.Norman Watson of Dundee ,who recently wrote a new book on the “POET” used some of my research in writing it.
Regards
Frank McGonigal Ont.Canada.
Hey Frank,
I’d be interested to see where our family trees connect. I’ve been working on a family tree so far and have reached up to my Great Great Great Grandfather which would be Andrew McGunigal married to Euphemia McGunigal. Its starting to get fuzzy when it comes to research at this point. I’ve been told that he had three other brothers Jim, Adam, Steve McGunigal, I wonder why the McGunigal/McGonigal name was changed as often as it was in these records… (email johnmcgunigal@gmail.com)
Not only does the spelling of McGonagall vary enormously, but William’s age varies miraculously from census to census, apparently ageing anywhere between 6 and 16 years per decade. So I guess we’ll never know how old he was when he died, 76, 79 or something else!